An Phoblacht/Republican News, Vol. 13, No. 13
Date:1991
Organisation:Sinn Féin
Publication:An Phoblacht
Issue:Volume 13, Number 13
28 Márta / Thursday, 28 March, 1991
Contributors:Hilda MacThomas, Dara MacNeill, Liam Ó Coileáin, Peter O' Rourke
Collections:1916 Easter Rising: Anniversaries and Commemorations, Music in the Irish Left Archive
View: View Document
Discuss:Comments on this document
Subjects: 1916 Easter Rising

Please note: The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to the Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners.

Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution

15th June 2009

This edition of An Phoblacht is devoted to the 75th Anniversary of the 1916 Rising. And therefore it provides an encapsulation of the Sinn Féin position at a time prior to the ceasefires and yet when the political dynamic was moving slowly towards a context where they would become possible. In this light the editorial is of particular interest. Added to this was the necessary legitimation of their then positions in the context of 1916, as when it explicitly argues that “IRA same then as now”.

In 1991, there are those who do not wish to remember 1916 because they fear the link will be made between the Irish Republican Army of today and its predecessors of Easter Week. There are others who will pay lip-service to 1916 and claim that the IRA of today is fundamentally different and not fighting in the same cause. Both are wrong. The Irish Republican Army which came into being on the bullet-swept streets of Dublin in 1916, is the same IRA, fighting in the same cause, as that which confronts British rule in arms today.

From the perspective of the archive it is difficult to say that this is an explicitly left document although it is infused with language that tilts towards leftist concerns. Consider this quote from the editorial:

In decades of opposition to partition and upholding the ideals of the Proclamation, republicans have sacrificed much. They have also been proven right. Justice, equality and peace are not and never were possible in a partitioned Ireland. This is as true today as when partition was first imposed; the record of poverty, violence, unemployment, sectarianism, discrimination, unemployment, emigration - symptoms of political, social, economic and cultural failure in both states, proves the point.

And it concludes…

In one of his last messages during Easter Week, James Connolly paid tribute to all his comrades when he said: “Never had man or woman a grander cause, never was a cause more grandly served.” We repeat that message today and are confident that the cause of Connolly and Pearse and all ho have followed them will triumph in the ’90s.

Yet it would be wrong to say that there is no overt hint of leftism. Perhaps most tellingly in the form of a two page article on leathanach 14 which deals with “James Connolly - the practical visionary”. By contrast Pearse is given a single page. The Connolly article rebuts the idea, which it argues is put about by “revisionist historians” that … “James Connolly’s participating in the 1916 uprising is the ultimate proof of his abandonment of socialism”. The analysis offered there attempts with varying degrees of success to argue the correctness of Connolly’s actions, arguing that while a breach with ‘classical’ Marxism it was ‘a thoroughly socialist perspective, similar (though not identical) to the strategy then being followed by Lenin in Russia’. And it concludes with the proposition that Labour in its various manifestations ducked away from the possibilities offered in the post-1916 period through to the establishment of the Free State, and has done so ever since.

There’s much more to say, but perhaps others will give their opinions on the document as a whole.

Apologies for file size. Am I correct in assuming most of us are now on broad band? Or are there some toiling away on dial-up? Please tell me so I can tailor, as best as is possible, PDFs to suit.

This text and these files are a resource for use freely by anyone who wants to for whatever purpose – that’s the whole point of the Archive (well that and the discussions). But if you do happen to use them we’d really appreciate if you mentioned that you found them at the Irish Left Online Document Archive…

More from An Phoblacht

An Phoblacht in the archive


Comments

No Comments yet.

Add a Comment

Formatting Help

Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:

**Bold text**
Bold text

_Italic text_
Italic text

[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link

You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution

  • By: Starkadder Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:54:43

    The piece around Gaybo reminded me he always disliked the
    Provos, and some of Harris’ crowd in RTE were associated with
    the Late Late Show.

    But Gaybo was still miles better than Prat Kenny.

    Not sure how Turbidy will turn out.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:07:27

    I’m not filled with hope, let’s put it that way. I’m sort of agnostic on Byrne, he certainly did some good but as he aged the middle class ossification set in in his views. Radical in his thirties he was reactionary later on. Kenny, dear oh dear oh dear. I always recall a story I heard him tell on his radio show in the late 90s or early 00s where he was saying how a US radio company wanted him to do a show with them and how they ‘thought I was ten years younger than I really am’… self-serving, no?

    Tubridy. Nice lad, but as Robert Christgau once wrote, the world is full of nice lads…

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Garibaldy Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:19:20

    No name on the Connolly piece, interestingly. Also I noted the praise lavished on the attempt to kill the secretary or whatever she was in the police base. It brought to my mind the RIRA justification of shooting the pizza delivery men.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: WorldbyStorm Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:43:38

    That’s true. Wasn’t this during the tail end of the period when the list of ‘legitimate’ targets was extended?

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Garibaldy Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:03:01

    I think the threats to shopkeepers etc was the late 1980s, and kept going. The proxy bombs, organised from Derry, had happened before this I think. Shows how determined they were to ignore public opinion, even within their own areas.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Neues aus den Archiven der radikalen Linken « Entdinglichung Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:59:05

    […] Sinn Féin: An Phoblacht, 75th Anniversary of the Rising Issue […]

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: RBrooks Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:26:28

    I noticed your reference to the list of “legitimate targets” I am doing some research on the PIRA and trying to learn a little more about this list. Was it actually a published list in the paper? If so, do you know what it would usually consist of? Thanks for any help you can offer.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: . Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:40:30

    i what a united ireland and im in the noth ire.

    Reply on the CLR