Build the Socialist Labour Party through United Mass Action
Date:1978
Organisation:Socialist Labour Party
Authors:Alan Bruce, Anne Conway, Maurice Coakley, Bettty Purcell
View: View Document
Discuss:Comments on this document
Subjects:

Please note: The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to the Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners.

Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution

3rd June 2019

This month we intend to post up documents from the Socialist Labour Party which existed in the late 1970s and was a serious attempt to construct a further left platform party.

Many thanks to the person who forwarded this to the Archive, a Socialist Labour Party internal discussion document which in 14 pages engages with issues facing the SLP, most notably, The National Question, The Women’s Movement & The Left and finally The Economic Crisis, Trade Unions and Politics.

As the Introduction notes:

We have written this document as a contribution taking place before and during the conference. It is not a tendency document nor is it intended for voting on; although we will be arguing in support of the general lines of the 3 main policy documents voted for by the NEC.

And it also notes:

The first task of any Socialist party is to look reality hard in the face. We must be modest about ourselves. We are a small party, we have a few hundred members. We all want to build a mass Socialist party. The question that face us is how this is to be done.

And it argues for ‘non-exclusiveness’ in mass campaigns, asserting that ’this is the key to building’ those campaigns and ’to break down the sectarianism which has always paralysed the Irish left’.

There’s much else including a critique of Dr. Noel Browne’s views on Socialism and Republicanism where they suggest that ‘[he] seriously underestimates the role of British Imperialism in Ireland and consequently is confused about republicanism’ and also argue ‘that Socialists must have a positive approach to the women’s movement, that we must recognise its independence, that our women members should actively participate in it, and that w should seek to integrate feminist conceptions into our theory and practice, always remembering that without the liberation of women we will not achieve true socialism’.

They also note ‘we do not have a section on agriculture. This is not a reflection on our disinterest but of our ignorance. The Irish left is of course almost entirely centred in towns and knows very little about the countryside; indeed it is usually steeped in urban chauvinism…. We believe the starting point must be around the question – what programme would be capable fo drawing the most oppressed layers in the countryside – the small farmers, the agricultural labourers, the rural unemployed and underemployed – into struggle alongside the urban working class’.

More from Socialist Labour Party

Socialist Labour Party in the archive


Comments

No Comments yet.

Add a Comment

Formatting Help

Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:

**Bold text**
Bold text

_Italic text_
Italic text

[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link

You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution

  • By: Alibaba Tue, 04 Jun 2019 12:29:11

    This interests me. The SLP was a great precedent for politically advanced activists keying-in to a radical climate. That experience counts for much.

    It should be remembered that such a party can fail, as the SLP did, where differences were often extreme, among those that prioritised the local elections and declined to uphold the mandating of TDs, support the H Block prisoners or support for abortion rights, to name a few of the issues.

    I yearn for a new party (or realistically some new broad-based left formation) that will be built on a principled political basis. This being said, it means there must be one pre-condition: participants must rule out coalition government with right-wing parties.

    Ideally, other conditions would also prevail. Membership would consist of people from very different political orientations. If it is going to have an inclusive internal political life, it needs a regime that has to tolerate difference and the best regime is facilitated, in my view, by permitting tendencies.

    Be wary of any veto for any group or leader and there should be a balanced approach when highly controversial issues come up which need to be discussed over time. This means everybody knuckling down to democracy. When decisions are taken on policy or specific actions, it requires disciplined unity in its implementation by all members.

    It must also be driven by the commitment to maximise unity and co-operative actions around the issues we agree on. It would preferably have recognisable branding and participants would fly the flag literally and metaphorically. People want an identifiable organisation, not a hodgepodge of oppositionists. This recipe for a politically stronger Left could season its current marginalisation. Make sense? Call me a chronic optimist: better that than a pessimist crank.

    Reply on the CLR