Poblacht na nOibrithe, No. 1
Date:2012
Organisation:Éirígí
Publication:Poblacht na nOibrithe
Issue:Number 1
View: View Document
Discuss:Comments on this document
Subjects:

Please note: The Irish Left Archive is provided as a non-commercial historical resource, open to all, and has reproduced this document as an accessible digital reference. Copyright remains with its original authors. If used on other sites, we would appreciate a link back and reference to the Irish Left Archive, in addition to the original creators. For re-publication, commercial, or other uses, please contact the original owners.

Commentary From The Cedar Lounge Revolution

4th November 2013

Many thanks to the person who forwarded this to the Archive.

This is a first for the Archive, a document from Éirígí, the first issue of their Poblacht na hOibrithe (Workers’ Republic) newspaper issued by Éirígí in 2012. Éirígí (‘Arise’) was established in 2006 by former members of Sinn Féin, initially as a campaigning group. A year later it became an all-island political party. It’s political aims are British withdrawal from Northern Ireland and the establishment of a 32-country democratic socialist Irish Republic. It has achieved a considerable degree of prominence in a range of campaigns across Ireland and at one point it had two affiliated Councillors, one in Dungannon (who subsequently left to become an Independent) and former Sinn Féin Councillor Louise Minihan in Dublin.

This newspaper, which from the range of topics is written for a Northern audience, is a well produced document, eight pages long and somewhat larger than A3. It is colour throughout. The front page article is about ‘Stormont’s hidden scandal: 130,000 now seeking work’. It has a varied contents reflecting on ‘Stormont’s Agenda of Inequality’, ‘Political Policing still A Reality’, ‘Housing is a Right’, ‘Modern Internment’ and 1913.

The editorial argues that ‘anyone studying the pages of this edition of Poblacht na nOibrithe will see all the signs of a deeply sick society. Or, more likely still, they will have already recognised them every day in their own lives’.

In the areas of healthcare, housing and employment, in its treatment of children, pensioners and the most vulnerable, the Six County statelet is failing dramatically.

It continues:

For those with even the most rudimentary understanding of history, these statistics will come as no surprise. Since its brutal inception, the Six County state has acted as a bulwark against progress on every level – socially, economically, culturally and nationally.

What is different this time, however, is the smokescreen that has been erected to obscure the facts. For more than a decade we’ve been told we’re living in the ‘New Northern Ireland’, a place where everyone has an equal stake. To seek this lie the British government has co-opted the constitutional nationalist parties and a sizeable group of castle catholics into a coalition with big house unionism, leaving working class communities with the illusion of a peace dividend and ever-growing dole queues.

It argues:

…there has been no peace dividend for the working class people of Belfast, Newry, Derry City and anywhere else you choose to name in the Six Counties. Britain’s latest strategy to pacify this place has amounted to creating enough stability to allow multinationals to make obscene profits and the middle classes to live comfortably, leaving the rest of us to suffer in silence.

And it asserts that:

All this inequality and injustice is sold to us by a pliant bunch of visionless politicians and a grovelling corporate media. And, if like republicans and socialists across Ireland, you refuse to buy what they’re selling, the armed enforcers of the PSNI, MI5 and other sinister elements of the occupation will drop the heavy hand.

It suggests that éirígí is a natural home for those seeking to ameliorate or overthrow the above.

Our communities are in desperate need of an alternative and éirígí is in no doubt as to what that alternative should be. The Irish working class has gained exactly nothing from constitutional politics and participation in state structures that were established to serve the interests of the wealthy, not the plebs. What few rights the Irish working class has, it holds as a result of grass roots struggle and militant action.

And it concludes by stating:

The time has long passed for the removal of British rule and economic exploitation from this country. A 32-county socialist republic is as viable a solution now as it was when it was fought for in 1916 or hungered for in the H-Blocks in 1981. But the Republic only stands a chance if our communities become centres of resistance to the British government and the parasites who call themselves bankers, landlords and businessmen.

More from Éirígí

Éirígí in the archive


Comments

No Comments yet.

Add a Comment

Formatting Help

Comments can be formatted in Markdown format . Use the toolbar to apply the correct syntax to your comment. The basic formats are:

**Bold text**
Bold text

_Italic text_
Italic text

[A link](http://www.example.com)
A link

You can join this discussion on The Cedar Lounge Revolution

  • By: Bob Smiles Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:38:07

    I never knew this group had a newspaper. Sad to hear that they have a lot of members leaving, they are at least as relevant as the alphabet soup of the far left

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Florrie O'Donoghue Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:27:33

    I wasn’t aware that a lot of members were leaving. Has that been reported anywhere?

    I was reading, just now, a thread on politics.ie where éirígí recently took part in an anti-eviction gathering in Kanturk in north Cork. Louise Minihan is in one of the accompanying photographs. I do not know if the other éirígí members present are also from Dublin.

    http://www.politics.ie/forum/united-left-alliance/217931-how-low-can-they-go-socialist-party-accuse-labour-forcing-mother-children-disabilities-onto-side-road.html

    Is mise srl.,

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Bob Smiles Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:27:09

    Heard that from a few people, perhaps biased.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: dilettante Mon, 04 Nov 2013 23:09:42

    Heard they had some potential as a street theatre troupe, perhaps biased.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: duibh Sat, 16 Nov 2013 22:32:12

    EÍRÍGÍ NUMBERS ARE RAPIDLY GROWING NOT DECLINING.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: cob Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:14:26

    That is not what others are saying. Seems things are going downhill. See Pensive Quill

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: cob Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:16:33

    That picture of Minihan is at an anti-eviction protest in Bluebell, Dublin. The person that was to be evicted was a member of eirigi

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Joe Mon, 18 Nov 2013 20:46:53

    I’ve always been intrigued by the name. I see WBS translates it as Arise. I would translate it as Get Up. Are they the only political grouping in Ireland whose name is an instruction?
    When I think of it, I think of a bunch of Gaeltacht mammies giving out to their wayward sons. Éirígí as bhur leapacha agus ithigí bhur mbricfeasta, a phaca bligeaird! Get up outa that!
    Has there been any formal splits in Éirígí as opposed to driftings away? I imagine a group who feel that Éirígí’s analysis is too cautious and that the time has come to make bold advances – so they split to form Léimigí. Another tendency feel that it’s ridiculous to be telling people to Get Up when the people are asleep. So they split to form Dúisígí.
    And of course the perennial danger in organisations involved with the Irish language – the dialectical split. The Kerry branches split because they say it should be pronounced Éiríg (as in Seo libh canaíg amhrán na bhFiann). In Donegal they want Aoirigí (which as I read it gets even better – it translates as Satirize!!!). And I’m sure the Cork member left long ago cos he wasn’t going to have some crowd up in Dublin telling what to do or how to pronounce it.

    Reply on the CLR

  • By: Michael Carley Mon, 18 Nov 2013 23:56:28

    Which brought to mind the Cornish language movement, which, despite having no native speakers, has managed to split:

    http://www.cornwall24.co.uk/language-culture/topic3902.html

    Reply on the CLR